The supreme court, of the corporate United states, decides Heller v. new york, declaring as unlawful―via the fraudulent 14th amendment―the wholesale seizure of an entire publication, as opposed to one copy. “[S]eizing films to destroy them or to block their distribution or exhibition is a very different matter from seizing a single copy of a film for the bona fide purpose of preserving it as evidence in a criminal proceeding.” The constitution of new york already has sufficient provisions against unreasonable searches and seizures.
NOTE: This is the further realization of plank number four of the “Communist Manifesto” by Karl Marx.
[restored 11/9/2022]
The supreme court, of the corporate United states, hands down In re Griffiths: Via the fraudulent 14th amendment, states may not disqualify foreign nationals from becoming attorneys (government licensed legal counsel). In rendering this decision, the court ignored the connecticut constitution of 1965, article I, section 1.
[restored 7/10/2025]
Subsequent Events:
Authority:
“Law of the Jungle”
ccc-2point0.com/preface
References:
Gerald Gunther, Constitutional Law, twelfth edition, (Westbury, New York: Foundation Press, 1991), 681.
In re Griffiths :: 413 U.S. 717 (1973) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/413/717/#F4
Heller v. new york – Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heller_v._new_york
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks
www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html